<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AFI 31-101: Air Force Installation Security Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/</link>
	<description>Get the Plain Facts about the U.S. Military</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munchma Qutchi</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Munchma Qutchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>Please to be sending me the AFI, and also any other air force documents you are to be having. Particular interested in information about base vulerability and also Air Forces capabilities. I am totally not Al Qaeda, I&#039;m like a contractor or something. Reply to: Munchma Qutchi, Cave 37, Tora-Bora, Afghanistan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please to be sending me the AFI, and also any other air force documents you are to be having. Particular interested in information about base vulerability and also Air Forces capabilities. I am totally not Al Qaeda, I&#8217;m like a contractor or something. Reply to: Munchma Qutchi, Cave 37, Tora-Bora, Afghanistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davon Taylor</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Davon Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-984</guid>
		<description>I am updating my AFI Publications and I was hoping to get the most updated AFI 31-101</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am updating my AFI Publications and I was hoping to get the most updated AFI 31-101</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get real</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Get real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Try looking up AFR 207-4. It&#039;s the old AFR covering Physical Security. It&#039;s now an AR (190-16 I think), declassified. As far as these comments about things being classified...A) It&#039;s the Air Force which means nothing but combat missions are classified B) Whatever the AF does the Army does and they don&#039;t see the big deal about already declassified info and C) these people seem to be active duty which means that they really do think there are such things a secrets. Wake up. I can find the names on organizational rosters with a few clicks and a few LEGAL questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try looking up AFR 207-4. It&#8217;s the old AFR covering Physical Security. It&#8217;s now an AR (190-16 I think), declassified. As far as these comments about things being classified&#8230;A) It&#8217;s the Air Force which means nothing but combat missions are classified B) Whatever the AF does the Army does and they don&#8217;t see the big deal about already declassified info and C) these people seem to be active duty which means that they really do think there are such things a secrets. Wake up. I can find the names on organizational rosters with a few clicks and a few LEGAL questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Too fun !! 

If you work security or secure systems - in the military, as a govie or a contractor puke ... FOLLOW THE GODDAM RULES or get into another line of work. 

Maybe you can be a Senator and then &#039;leak&#039; info as you see fit. Everyone else - get in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too fun !! </p>
<p>If you work security or secure systems &#8211; in the military, as a govie or a contractor puke &#8230; FOLLOW THE GODDAM RULES or get into another line of work. </p>
<p>Maybe you can be a Senator and then &#8216;leak&#8217; info as you see fit. Everyone else &#8211; get in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look@thefoolsabove</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Look@thefoolsabove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Honestly....  Asking for this AFI on the internetzzzz, is like a complete strange who&#039;s wearing a shirt that say&#039;s &quot;I like little boys&quot; coming up to you at a Wal-Mart parking lot and asking to take your 5 year old son to Dinsey Land.   The words &quot;Installation Secruity&quot; should be enough for you to realize that this document is not handed out like candy to whomever asks for it, c&#039;mon.... You have better commonsense than that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly&#8230;.  Asking for this AFI on the internetzzzz, is like a complete strange who&#8217;s wearing a shirt that say&#8217;s &#8220;I like little boys&#8221; coming up to you at a Wal-Mart parking lot and asking to take your 5 year old son to Dinsey Land.   The words &#8220;Installation Secruity&#8221; should be enough for you to realize that this document is not handed out like candy to whomever asks for it, c&#8217;mon&#8230;. You have better commonsense than that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF SME</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>SF SME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-729</guid>
		<description>Anyone working on contract, or bidding on one, will be granted access to the required documentation by the responsible government procurement agency in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).  So anyone on here requesting a copy of restricted information for the purpose of fulfilling government work is either A) not capable of performing said work (aka a dumbass), or B) they are lying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone working on contract, or bidding on one, will be granted access to the required documentation by the responsible government procurement agency in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).  So anyone on here requesting a copy of restricted information for the purpose of fulfilling government work is either A) not capable of performing said work (aka a dumbass), or B) they are lying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF Airman</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>SF Airman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-585</guid>
		<description>Wow all of these ppl asking for classified military documents... funny how all these lame ass briefing are because of ppl like this tryin to get that one dumbass to leak info... Fuck you all, youre the reason ppl like me gotta sit through hours of briefing on INFOCON levels and all this other bullshit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow all of these ppl asking for classified military documents&#8230; funny how all these lame ass briefing are because of ppl like this tryin to get that one dumbass to leak info&#8230; Fuck you all, youre the reason ppl like me gotta sit through hours of briefing on INFOCON levels and all this other bullshit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security Forces</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Security Forces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want a copy, I just want to know if the AFI 31-101 states if civilians can guard PL 1, 2 and 3 planes and buildings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want a copy, I just want to know if the AFI 31-101 states if civilians can guard PL 1, 2 and 3 planes and buildings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Security Forces</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Security Forces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 01:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-479</guid>
		<description>There is absolutely no reason why anyone working for the AF on any kind of project would need to go through unsecured sites like this to get access to this reg. Contact Security Forces at the base you&#039;re doing work for. There are proper procedures for things like this. If you&#039;re not conducting official government business you should not need this information. Regardless of who you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is absolutely no reason why anyone working for the AF on any kind of project would need to go through unsecured sites like this to get access to this reg. Contact Security Forces at the base you&#8217;re doing work for. There are proper procedures for things like this. If you&#8217;re not conducting official government business you should not need this information. Regardless of who you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Manyweather</title>
		<link>http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Manyweather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://military.plainfacts.net/security/afi-31-101-air-force-installation-security-program/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>I work for HQ Air Force Real Property Agency, a DRU under the SAF.  I am currenly working on an Air Force Lease/Acquisition for one of the HQ/ACC bases which has encroachment issues. As part of the justification for this action, AFI 31-101 dated October 09 was cited as the governing instruction for this acquisition action, specifically under Integrated Defense Chapter 2. We are trying to mitigate the risk to ensure mission assurance with proper AT/FP and stand off distances.  I really need to bump our 32 series AFI&#039;s against AFI 31-101.  Can you assist by providing a copy of AFI 31-101, Oct 09 version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for HQ Air Force Real Property Agency, a DRU under the SAF.  I am currenly working on an Air Force Lease/Acquisition for one of the HQ/ACC bases which has encroachment issues. As part of the justification for this action, AFI 31-101 dated October 09 was cited as the governing instruction for this acquisition action, specifically under Integrated Defense Chapter 2. We are trying to mitigate the risk to ensure mission assurance with proper AT/FP and stand off distances.  I really need to bump our 32 series AFI&#8217;s against AFI 31-101.  Can you assist by providing a copy of AFI 31-101, Oct 09 version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

